Picc Excellence logo

PICC Excellence, Inc

Picc Excellence Twitter Icon Picc Excellence Facebook Icon
Shopping Cart Image
login/create account

Comparison of Postinfusion Phlebitis in Intravenous Push Versus Intravenous Piggyback Cefazolin

Content:
Posted to IV Team Nov 8, 2012" placeholder="Biggar C, Nichols C. Comparison of Postinfusion Phlebitis in Intravenous Push Versus Intravenous Piggyback Cefazolin. JIN. Nov 2012 2012;35(6):384-388. Reducing health care costs without adversely affecting patient safety is a constant challenge for health care institutions. Cefazolin prophylaxis via intravenous push (IVP) is more cost-effective than via intravenous piggyback (IVPB). The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient safety would be compromised (ie, an increased rate of phlebitis) with a change to the IVP method. Rates of phlebitis in orthopedic surgical patients receiving cefazolin prophylaxis via IVP versus IVPB were evaluated in a prospective quasi-experimental design of 240 patients. The first 120 subjects received cefazolin via IVPB, and the second 120 subjects received it via IVP. Results indicated no statistically significant difference in phlebitis rates in the IVPB (3.4%) versus the IVP groups (3.3%). link to reference Posted to IV Team Nov 8, 2012" >" >" >" >

Return to Resource Center

| Education | Resource Center | Consulting | Contact Us | About Us | Site Map

PICC Excellence Inc. an educational service for clinicians



Picc Excellence Twitter Icon Picc Excellence Facebook Icon

401 E. Howell St. Hartwell, GA 30643

info@piccexcellence.com

(706) 377 3360

PICC Certification ™ and CPUI ™ are trademarks. Used under license. © 2019 PICC Excellence, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Provider approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing. Provider # CEP15304, and Florida Board of Nursing Provider # 50-1594. And the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists (CAMRT)